![]() The text on p21 discusses many sources of uncertainty (including the lifetime issue), but how were these combined to make 30–40% and the error bars (whatever they are) in Fig. Related to this, the TROPOMI-derived emission uncertainty is stated to be 30–40% (p21, L428), but it isn’t clear where these numbers come from.Would more smoothing produce better SSIMs and more accurate inversion of the emissions? 72 km, but the Gaussian smoothing used to produce Fig. The authors assume an NO2 lifetime of 4 hours when deriving emissions, but shouldn’t this lifetime impact the footprint on the sources when comparing to the satellite data? With 5 m/s winds for example 4 hours of advection transports the NOx ca.Many citations use parentheses incorrectly. Some sentences make no sense by themselves, but do make sense if joined to the next sentence. Many commas are misplaced, making sentences difficult to read and understand. ![]() Many statements are unsupported or confusing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |